Experimental Study In Comparing The Effects Of Active And Passive Sentences On Reader Comprehension In Academic Texts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58355/qwt.v2i1.37Keywords:
Active Voice, Passive Voice, Academic WritingAbstract
Expert guidelines recommend using active over passive voice to improve clarity in English academic writing. However, few systematic reviews synthesize research on reader outcomes from texts written in the passive versus active voice. This paper reviewed experimental studies comparing the effects of active and passive voice on reader comprehension in English academic writing. Methods: Following Prisma guidelines, database searches identified quantitative studies manipulating voice in academic texts and measuring differential impacts on reader understanding. 9 eligible studies were analyzed narratively. Results: Studies consistently demonstrated reduced readability, slower processing, and lower comprehension scores for passive versus active voice texts across reader groups and disciplines. On coherence ratings, grammatical errors, and comprehension questions, passive voice performed significantly worse. Conclusions: Strong evidence confirms active voice improves reader comprehension over passive in academic writing. However, strategic passive usage may still benefit writing on a situational basis. More research is needed on providing effective instruction to EFL students on selectively deploying active/passive principles. Originality: This systematic review is the first to synthesize major studies comparing active and passive voice impacts on reader outcomes in academic writing. The consistent experimental results provide an empirical basis for style guidelines favoring active voice for clarity.
Downloads
References
Charles, M. (2013). Active and Passive Voice in Research Articles: An Interdisciplinary Study.
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 18(3), 279-318.
Chen, L. (2020). Active and Passive Voice Use in Academic Writing by Chinese EFL Learners. Journal of Second Language Writing 51, 100846.
Didik Himmawan, Ahmad Khotibul Umam, & Rodotul Janah. (2023). Pemberdayaan Anak-Anak Di Desa Jambe Kecamatan Kertasemaya Kabupaten Indramayu. Diplomasi : Jurnal Demokrasi, Pemerintahan Dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat, 1(1), 42–52. https://doi.org/10.58355/dpl.v1i1.9
Didik Himmawan, Syaefulloh, Sofyan Sauri, & Azi Khoirurrahman. (2023). Peran Tenaga Pendidik Dalam Transformasi Pendidikan Menuju Generasi Emas Indonesia. Manajia: Journal of Education and Management, 1(1), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.58355/manajia.v1i1.3
Gressang, J. (2021). Voice and Readability in Scientific Writing. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 51(1), 94-111.
Himmawan, D. ., & Rinih, R. (2022). Pelaksanaan Ekskul Kepenulisan Pembuatan Karya Ilmiah pada Kelas XII MA Al-Urwatul Wutsqo Kecamatan Sindang Kabupaten Indramayu. Journal Islamic Pedagogia, 2(2), 106–111. https://doi.org/10.31943/pedagogia.v2i2.66
Hyland, K. (2008). Disciplinary Voices: Interactions in Research Writing. English Text Construction 1(1), 5-22.
Indah Wijayanti, Neviyarni S, & Herman Nirwana. (2023). Concepts, Factors, Roles, and Efforts in Increasing Learning Motivation. Manajia: Journal of Education and Management, 2(1), 70–82. https://doi.org/10.58355/manajia.v2i1.32
Jalilifar, A., & Shooshtari, Z. G. (2011). Active or Passive: That is the Question. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2(4), 29-38.
Maulida Fitri, Neviyarni S, & Herman Nirwana. (2024). Cognitive View of Learning: Definition, Complexity and Problem Solving. Manajia: Journal of Education and Management, 2(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.58355/manajia.v2i1.28
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med 6(7): e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed1000097
Oshima, A., & Hogue, A. (2007). Introduction to Academic Writing (3rd ed.). Pearson Longman.
Peters, P. (2019). Active versus Passive Voice: The Shift Forward. The Writing Center Journal 37(1), 89-113.
Saeidi, M., & Sahebkheir, F. (2011). The Application of Passive Voice in the Iranian EFL Learners' Writings. English Language Teaching, 4(1), 208-213.
Sekar Kurnia Rahmadani, Neviyarni S, & Herman Nirwana. (2024). Developing Student Abilities Through Classroom Management: Principles, Components and Role of the Teacher. Manajia: Journal of Education and Management, 2(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.58355/manajia.v2i1.33
Syifa Nur Fadilah, and Didik Himmawan. 2023. “Desain Bimbingan Belajar Yang Efektif Untuk Kemandirian Belajar (Studi Di MTs An-Nur Kota Cirebon Dan SMP Muhammadiyah Cirebon)”. Risalah, Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Studi Islam 9 (2):960-67. https://doi.org/10.31943/jurnal_risalah.v9i2.552.
Thessia Permata Bunda, Neviyarni S, & Herman Nirwana. (2024). The Role of Motivation in Influencing Student Success in Learning. Manajia: Journal of Education and Management, 2(1), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.58355/manajia.v2i1.29
Wahyu Rifa’i, Didik Himmawan, & Ibnudin. (2023). Implementasi Pembelajaran Menggunakan Metode Bermain Bagi Anak-Anak Desa Tenajar Kidul Kecamatan Kertasemaya Kabupaten Indramayu. Journal Of Psychology, Counseling And Education, 1(1), 35–40. https://doi.org/10.58355/psy.v1i1.9
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Muhammad Fadhil Uzmi, Tasya Nadira, Yani Lubis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
